🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.